Lung Cancer Clinical Trial
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy Compared With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With High-Risk Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Summary
RATIONALE: Surgery with or without internal radiation therapy may be an effective treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Internal radiation uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be able to send x-rays directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal tissue. It is not yet known whether stereotactic body radiation therapy is more effective than surgery with or without internal radiation therapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well surgery with or without internal radiation therapy works compared with stereotactic body radiation therapy in treating patients with high-risk stage IA or stage IB non-small cell lung cancer.
Full Description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
To ascertain whether patients treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate that is no more than 10% less than patients treated with sublobar resection (SR).
Secondary
To compare loco-regional recurrence-free survival between study arms.
To compare disease-free survival between study arms.
To compare grade 3 or higher specific adverse event profiles between study arms at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-therapy.
To compare pulmonary function between patients treated with SBRT and patients treated with SR.
To compare the adverse events and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in each arm for patients with low or high Charlson comorbidity index scores, including a test interaction between Charlson comorbidity index scores (low vs high) and treatment arm.
Tertiary
To compare the quality-adjusted survival between the SBRT and SR treatments in terms of time to death (primary) and time until recurrence (secondary).
To examine whether pre-operative and post-operative clinically significant deficits in previously identified prognostic PRO domains (overall quality of life [QOL], fatigue, anxiety, and dyspnea) are associated with shorter patient survival in this patient population and to compare the relative effectiveness of each treatment (SBRT and SR).
To contribute to an ACOSOG bank of normative data in order to improve short/long-term outcomes of cancer patients by identifying patients experiencing clinically significant deficits in patient-reported outcomes and the relationship to genetic variables.
To explore whether blood-based biomarkers, including osteopontins, will be able to predict which patients will be at high risk for recurrence by treatment with either SBRT or SR. (exploratory)
To explore whether blood-based biomarkers, including TGF-β1, will be able to predict which patients will be at high risk for pulmonary complications by treatment with either SBRT or SR. (exploratory)
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to planned brachytherapy (yes vs no) and ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Arm I: Patients undergo sublobar resection comprising either a wedge resection or anatomical segmentectomy with or without intraoperative brachytherapy* comprising an iodine I 125 implant at the resection margin.
Arm II: Patients undergo 3 fractions of stereotactic body radiation therapy at 2-8 days apart.
NOTE: *Patients may receive brachytherapy at the discretion of treating physician.
Patients may undergo blood sample collection at baseline and periodically during study for correlative studies. Tumor tissue samples may also be collected from patients who undergo resection.
Patients complete the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA), and the UCDS Shortness of Breath quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study and follow-up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 30 days, every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 1 year, and then yearly for 2 years.
Eligibility Criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Lung nodule suspicious for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Biopsy confirmation is strongly recommended but not required; if biopsy is attempted and non-diagnostic, if the patient refuses biopsy, or if the risk of biopsy is considered too high, patients may be enrolled if the mass is suspicious for NSCLC based on two or more of the following criteria:
Positive smoking history
Absence of benign calcifications within suspicious nodule
Activity on PET greater than normal tissue
Evidence of growth compared to previous imaging
Presence of spiculation
Tumor ≤ 4 cm maximum diameter, clinical stage IA or selected IB (i.e., with visceral pleural involvement) by PET/CT scan of the chest and upper abdomen performed within 60 days prior to registration
All clinically suspicious mediastinal N1, N2, or N3 lymph nodes (> 1 cm short-axis dimension on CT scan and/or positive on PET scan) confirmed negative for involvement with NSCLC by one of the following methods: mediastinoscopy, anterior mediastinotomy, endoscopic and/or endobronchial ultrasonography (EUS/EBUS)-guided needle aspiration, CT-guided, or video-assisted thoracoscopic or open lymph node biopsy
Tumor verified by a thoracic surgeon to be in a location that will permit sublobar resection
Tumor located peripherally within the lung, defined as not touching any surface within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree in all directions
Patients with non-peripheral (central) tumors are NOT eligible
No evidence of distant metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
ECOG performance status (PS) 0, 1, or 2
Patient at high-risk for surgery by meeting a minimum of one major criteria or two minor criteria as described below:
Major criteria
FEV1 ≤ 50% predicted
DLCO ≤ 50% predicted
Minor criteria
Age ≥ 75 years
FEV1 51-60% predicted
DLCO 51-60% predicted
Pulmonary hypertension (defined as a pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than 40 mm Hg) as estimated by echocardiography or right heart catheterization
Poor left ventricular function (defined as an ejection fraction of 40% or less)
Resting or exercise arterial pO2 ≤ 55 mm Hg or SpO2 ≤ 88%
pCO2 > 45 mm Hg
Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) Dyspnea Scale ≥ 3
Not pregnant or nursing
Negative urine or serum pregnancy test
Fertile patients must use effective contraception
No prior invasive malignancy, unless disease-free for ≥ 3 years prior to registration (except non-melanoma skin cancer, in-situ cancers).
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
No prior intra-thoracic radiotherapy
Prior radiotherapy as part of treatment for head and neck, breast, or other non-thoracic cancer is permitted
Prior chemotherapy or surgical resection for the lung cancer being treated on this protocol is NOT permitted
Check Your Eligibility
Let’s see if you might be eligible for this study.
What is your age and gender ?
There are 53 Locations for this study
Birmingham Alabama, 35294, United States
Phoenix Arizona, 85054, United States
Scottsdale Arizona, 85259, United States
Sacramento California, 95817, United States
San Francisco California, 94115, United States
Stanford California, 94305, United States
Jacksonville Florida, 32207, United States
Orlando Florida, 32806, United States
Atlanta Georgia, 30308, United States
Atlanta Georgia, 30322, United States
Savannah Georgia, 31403, United States
Chicago Illinois, 60637, United States
Peoria Illinois, 61637, United States
Lexington Kentucky, 40536, United States
Louisville Kentucky, 40202, United States
Annapolis Maryland, 21401, United States
Baltimore Maryland, 21201, United States
Baltimore Maryland, 21229, United States
Boston Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Boston Massachusetts, 02118, United States
Ann Arbor Michigan, 48109, United States
Royal Oak Michigan, 48073, United States
Rochester Minnesota, 55905, United States
Saint Louis Missouri, 63110, United States
Ridgewood New Jersey, 07450, United States
New York New York, 10025, United States
Rochester New York, 14642, United States
Stony Brook New York, 11794, United States
Syracuse New York, 13210, United States
Winston-Salem North Carolina, 27157, United States
Cincinnati Ohio, 45267, United States
Cleveland Ohio, 44195, United States
Columbus Ohio, 43210, United States
Portland Oregon, 97213, United States
Danville Pennsylvania, 17822, United States
Philadelphia Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
York Pennsylvania, 17405, United States
Charleston South Carolina, 29425, United States
Dallas Texas, 75246, United States
Dallas Texas, 75390, United States
Charlottesville Virginia, 22908, United States
Norfolk Virginia, 23507, United States
Everett Washington, 98201, United States
Seattle Washington, 98122, United States
La Crosse Wisconsin, 54601, United States
Milwaukee Wisconsin, 53226, United States
Milwaukee Wisconsin, 53295, United States
Waukesha Wisconsin, 53188, United States
London Ontario, N6A 4, Canada
Ottawa Ontario, K1Y 4, Canada
Toronto Ontario, M5G 2, Canada
Montreal Quebec, H2L 4, Canada
How clear is this clinincal trial information?
Please confirm you are a US based health care provider:
Yes, I am a health care Provider No, I am not a health care providerSign Up Now.
Take Control of Your Disease Journey.
Sign up now for expert patient guides, personalized treatment options, and cutting-edge insights that can help you push for the best care plan.