Radiation Boom–The Increasingly Popular Choi...
Lung Cancer
Radiation Boom–The Increasingly Popular Choice For Later Stage Cancer
A recent study supports the use of radiation therapy as an alternative to surgery in late stage cancer patients.
Published Feb 5, 2019
Radiation can also produce long-term survival for people with advanced cancer who are not good candidates for surgery. Those are the findings of an important piece of new research looking at metastatic cancer arising from so-called solid tumors in organs such as the lung, breast, and prostate.
Patients with metastatic cancer, or stage four cancer, are notoriously difficult to treat. In solid tumor cancers, past research has shown that surgical removal of solid tumors combined with subsequent chemotherapy can produce long-term survival for patients with late stage disease. While radiation has been previously proven to extend life slightly and relieve symptoms of cancer, it hadn’t been shown to produce long-term survival with similar success to surgery. That is, until now.
“Could we offer patients a noninvasive approach that could result in long term survival like we’ve seen with a traditional surgical approach?” was the question posed by the study’s lead author Dr. Dwight E. Heron, director of radiation services at UPMC Hillman Cancer Center in Pittsburgh. Dr. Heron and his colleagues found that the answer appears to be yes. And Heron hopes this study will lead to more doctors and patients discussing radiation therapy.
The study showed that late stage cancer patients who received high-dose radiation had significant long term survival. Specifically, the study examined 147 patients with what is called oligometastatic cancer — cancers that had been previously treated but then returned to a small number of other sites in the body. Researchers used a form of radiation therapy known as stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) therapy. SABR therapy is high-dose radiation delivered in a highly precise manner to solid tumors. The study showed that nearly half of the patients given SABR therapy were alive after five years and, in a smaller subset of patients, the cancer was completely eradicated. “It’s not going to cure everyone, but it can actually improve how long you live without cancer and, in a smaller group of patients, it can cure your cancer,” says Dr. Heron.
Typically low-dose radiation has been used to alleviate symptoms in stage four cancer patients, but not necessarily to extend survival. However, this study shows the potential for high-dose radiation therapy, such as SABR, to improve outcomes. “What we’ve defined here is a new paradigm. We’ve shown in this study [radiation] can be even more beneficial,” says Heron.
Dr. Heron believes it’s important that patients with late stage cancer begin asking their physicians about the potential for radiation therapy in treating their disease. “If I were a patient today with stage four cancer, I would be asking my oncologist now, ‘Is there a role for SABR to help improve my chances of having a better outcome?'”
Other radiation oncologists believe that radiation therapy needs to be part of the treatment discussion for late stage patients. Dr. Daniel Gomez, a radiation oncologist at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, has done research that also supports the use of concentrated high-dose radiation therapy in late stage lung cancer patients. Gomez’s study looked at patients with oligometastatic cancer of the lung who received prior therapy, but whose cancer returned to a small number of sites of the body. This is the same kind of stage four, metastatic disease that Heron examined. He found a similar result to Heron: patients who received high-dose radiation lived longer than those who did not.
Dr. Gomez told SurvivorNet that Heron’s study is important in that it “not only shows the potential for high-dose radiation therapy across tumor types, but also examines quality of life.” Notably, the radiation therapy used in Heron’s study caused no negative changes in the quality of life of patients.
Options for treatment for early and late stage cancer patients have increased in the past 15 years. Studies like Gomez’s and Heron’s show the potential for the use of radiation therapy. As Dr. Gomez puts it, “Given the long experience with surgery and with both methods being incorporated into clinical trials like this one, we will learn a great deal about the two approaches in this context over the next several years.”
Nonetheless, Gomez agrees that patients with late stage cancer should ask their physicians about radiation therapy, and that ultimately the decision is a personalized one. He says, “I think in the setting of metastatic disease it’s a reasonable question to ask your physician, particularly about clinical trials that may be available. It’s individualized–There are certain scenarios where either surgery or radiation is a capable approach, and that choice of treatment depends on how the discussions go between the surgeon, radiologist, and patient.”
Dr. Heron says the way to make sure that radiation is part of the discussion it is to have decisions about treatment made by doctors from different specialties. “In my view, the best model of care is a multidisciplinary, team-based approach to care.” In the past, which type of treatment you received largely depended on which type of oncologist you saw first. Now, however, Dr. Heron advises that patients consult with a team of oncologists, consisting of a surgical oncologist, a radiation oncologist, and a medical oncologist, to determine which treatment is the best course of action. “Our patients are far more empowered and far more educated now than they have been in the past, so they should insist that their doctors start talking to each other and ensure that they won’t be denied opportunities for therapies that would benefit them.” While choosing which treatment course to choose is a complex one, it is best made when patients are as well-informed as possible.
What should patients with late-stage cancer expect from radiation therapy going forward? Combining concentrated radiotherapy, such as SABR, with immunotherapy. Dr. Heron explains, “We think that radiation therapy can enhance the body’s immune response to cancer.” In a new clinical trial, Heron and his research group will be examining the effects of SABR on patients with a larger number of metastases–up to ten–as well as its impact on the immune system. For example, in a patient with ten metastases, Heron and his team will use radiotherapy to treat five of them and then see if the immune system can do the rest of the work. In this scenario, Heron explains, “We will take a look and see how well the radiation affects the tumors that were treated but more importantly, how it primes the immune system to respond and destroy the other five tumors that were not treated.”
To learn more about the role of radiation therapy and surgery in treating solid tumors, visit some of SurvivorNet’s other resources.
Learn more about SurvivorNet's rigorous medical review process.
Radiation can also produce long-term survival for people with advanced cancer who are not good candidates for surgery. Those are the findings of an important piece of new research looking at metastatic cancer arising from so-called solid tumors in organs such as the lung, breast, and prostate.
Patients with metastatic cancer, or stage four cancer, are notoriously difficult to treat. In solid tumor cancers, past research has shown that surgical removal of solid tumors combined with subsequent chemotherapy can produce long-term survival for patients with late stage disease. While radiation has been previously proven to extend life slightly and relieve symptoms of cancer, it hadn’t been shown to produce long-term survival with similar success to surgery. That is, until now.
“Could we offer patients a noninvasive approach that could result in long term survival like we’ve seen with a traditional surgical approach?” was the question posed by the study’s lead author Dr. Dwight E. Heron, director of radiation services at UPMC Hillman Cancer Center in Pittsburgh. Dr. Heron and his colleagues found that the answer appears to be yes. And Heron hopes this study will lead to more doctors and patients discussing radiation therapy.
The study showed that late stage cancer patients who received high-dose radiation had significant long term survival. Specifically, the study examined 147 patients with what is called oligometastatic cancer — cancers that had been previously treated but then returned to a small number of other sites in the body. Researchers used a form of radiation therapy known as stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) therapy. SABR therapy is high-dose radiation delivered in a highly precise manner to solid tumors. The study showed that nearly half of the patients given SABR therapy were alive after five years and, in a smaller subset of patients, the cancer was completely eradicated. “It’s not going to cure everyone, but it can actually improve how long you live without cancer and, in a smaller group of patients, it can cure your cancer,” says Dr. Heron.
Typically low-dose radiation has been used to alleviate symptoms in stage four cancer patients, but not necessarily to extend survival. However, this study shows the potential for high-dose radiation therapy, such as SABR, to improve outcomes. “What we’ve defined here is a new paradigm. We’ve shown in this study [radiation] can be even more beneficial,” says Heron.
Dr. Heron believes it’s important that patients with late stage cancer begin asking their physicians about the potential for radiation therapy in treating their disease. “If I were a patient today with stage four cancer, I would be asking my oncologist now, ‘Is there a role for SABR to help improve my chances of having a better outcome?'”
Other radiation oncologists believe that radiation therapy needs to be part of the treatment discussion for late stage patients. Dr. Daniel Gomez, a radiation oncologist at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, has done research that also supports the use of concentrated high-dose radiation therapy in late stage lung cancer patients. Gomez’s study looked at patients with oligometastatic cancer of the lung who received prior therapy, but whose cancer returned to a small number of sites of the body. This is the same kind of stage four, metastatic disease that Heron examined. He found a similar result to Heron: patients who received high-dose radiation lived longer than those who did not.
Dr. Gomez told SurvivorNet that Heron’s study is important in that it “not only shows the potential for high-dose radiation therapy across tumor types, but also examines quality of life.” Notably, the radiation therapy used in Heron’s study caused no negative changes in the quality of life of patients.
Options for treatment for early and late stage cancer patients have increased in the past 15 years. Studies like Gomez’s and Heron’s show the potential for the use of radiation therapy. As Dr. Gomez puts it, “Given the long experience with surgery and with both methods being incorporated into clinical trials like this one, we will learn a great deal about the two approaches in this context over the next several years.”
Nonetheless, Gomez agrees that patients with late stage cancer should ask their physicians about radiation therapy, and that ultimately the decision is a personalized one. He says, “I think in the setting of metastatic disease it’s a reasonable question to ask your physician, particularly about clinical trials that may be available. It’s individualized–There are certain scenarios where either surgery or radiation is a capable approach, and that choice of treatment depends on how the discussions go between the surgeon, radiologist, and patient.”
Dr. Heron says the way to make sure that radiation is part of the discussion it is to have decisions about treatment made by doctors from different specialties. “In my view, the best model of care is a multidisciplinary, team-based approach to care.” In the past, which type of treatment you received largely depended on which type of oncologist you saw first. Now, however, Dr. Heron advises that patients consult with a team of oncologists, consisting of a surgical oncologist, a radiation oncologist, and a medical oncologist, to determine which treatment is the best course of action. “Our patients are far more empowered and far more educated now than they have been in the past, so they should insist that their doctors start talking to each other and ensure that they won’t be denied opportunities for therapies that would benefit them.” While choosing which treatment course to choose is a complex one, it is best made when patients are as well-informed as possible.
What should patients with late-stage cancer expect from radiation therapy going forward? Combining concentrated radiotherapy, such as SABR, with immunotherapy. Dr. Heron explains, “We think that radiation therapy can enhance the body’s immune response to cancer.” In a new clinical trial, Heron and his research group will be examining the effects of SABR on patients with a larger number of metastases–up to ten–as well as its impact on the immune system. For example, in a patient with ten metastases, Heron and his team will use radiotherapy to treat five of them and then see if the immune system can do the rest of the work. In this scenario, Heron explains, “We will take a look and see how well the radiation affects the tumors that were treated but more importantly, how it primes the immune system to respond and destroy the other five tumors that were not treated.”
To learn more about the role of radiation therapy and surgery in treating solid tumors, visit some of SurvivorNet’s other resources.
Learn more about SurvivorNet's rigorous medical review process.
Later Stage Treatment: New Approaches
Employing the immune system is now a viable treatment option for many more people with advanced-stage lung cancer.
Later Stage Treatment: Immunotherapy
Employing the immune system is now a viable treatment option for many more people with advanced-stage lung cancer.